is the gap between the price you expect and the price you get. In every traditional liquidity model, larger trades mean worse prices. This is not a bug. It is a structural consequence of tying price to pool depth. The bonding curve that defines an AMM makes slippage mathematically inevitable: the more you trade, the more the price moves against you. Bolt eliminates this entirely. Because pricing is oracle-referenced rather than curve-derived, trade size does not affect the quoted price. Whether swapping 1, 10, or 100 tokens, users receive the same price relative to the market. There is no curve to slide along, no depth to exhaust, and no slippage to absorb.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.boltliquidity.io/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
How Bolt eliminates slippage
Adaptive Velocity Oracle (AVO)
Bolt’s Adaptive Velocity Oracle ingests real-time order books from multiple centralized exchanges and produces a deterministic reference price that is verifiable on-chain and completely independent of pool state. Unlike AMMs where the pool ratio is the price, Bolt’s pools have no influence on what you pay. The AVO predicts where price is heading rather than chasing it, and clamps on-chain price movement to prevent deviation from real-time market consensus.
Hedged settlement
After a swap executes on-chain at the oracle price, the market maker immediately hedges the trade on an external venue. This closes the risk loop without exposing the pool to directional risk. The pool is a settlement layer, not a speculative position.
Pool rebalancing
Hedged assets are returned on-chain to replenish inventory. Because hedging happens continuously, the pool maintains readiness without requiring deep capitalization. Bolt’s current daily inventory turnover of 29.7x is 23x the Sui DEX peer average — a direct consequence of this settlement cycle.
In traditional AMMs, larger trades mean worse prices. In Bolt, trade size does not affect execution price. This is the fundamental difference between curve-derived pricing and oracle-referenced pricing. Bolt does not optimize slippage. It removes the mechanism that causes it.
The cost of slippage across DeFi
Slippage is not a minor inconvenience. It is a structural tax on every participant in the ecosystem. For Users: every swap costs more than it should. Larger trades are penalized. Execution is unpredictable. For Aggregators: slippage degrades routing quality. Routes that should win on paper lose in execution because pool depth cannot support the trade size. For Builders: execution quality is outside their control. Users blame the dApp, but the problem is the underlying liquidity model. For Ecosystems: slippage drives volume to chains with deeper pools, creating an arms race of incentive spending that benefits no one long-term. Bolt breaks this cycle by removing the dependency between execution quality and capital depth.The proof
29.7x daily inventory turnover — 23x the Sui DEX peer average. Across 16 SUI/USDC pools spanning 8 protocols and 4 AMM architectures, the volume-weighted peer turnover is 1.28x. The highest single peer pool achieves 2.70x. Bolt’s oracle-referenced architecture produces a turnover rate that is structurally different, not incrementally better. This is what happens when pricing does not depend on pool depth.
See how Bolt compares
Head-to-head against AMMs, RFQs, intents, and CLOBs.
Jump to Quick Start
From install to first swap in 5 minutes.