Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.boltliquidity.io/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
How Bolt Positions
Every DeFi liquidity model in production today shares a fundamental assumption: execution quality is a function of liquidity depth. Bolt is the first model to break this dependency. The architecture decisions below illustrate how different models address the core execution problem: coupling or decoupling pricing from liquidity depth.Model Comparisons
- vs. AMMs / CLAMMs
- vs. RFQ / Intents
- vs. Traditional Prop-AMMs
- vs. CLOB
| Dimension | AMMs / CLAMMs | Bolt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing mechanism | Bonding curve derived from pool ratios | Oracle-referenced deterministic pricing |
| Slippage | Increases with trade size | Zero, price independent of trade size |
| Capital requirement | Deep liquidity required | Minimal, settlement only |
| LP risk | Impermanent loss, rebalancing costs | Delta-neutral hedging, no IL |
| Composability | Fully composable | Fully composable |
| Integration | Direct pool interaction | SDK integration for aggregators and dApps |
Sui SUI/USDC Turnover by Architecture
The model comparisons above describe architectural differences in theory. The table below shows how those differences play out in practice across the Sui SUI/USDC market.Turnover = daily volume / deployed capital. Figures are internally benchmarked.
| Architecture | Pools tracked | Turnover (vol-weighted) |
|---|---|---|
| CLMM | 11 pools, 5 protocols | 1.29x |
| CLAMM | 1 pool | 2.70x |
| CPMM | 1 pool | 0.09x |
| Prop-AMM (peer) | 3 pools | 2.04x |
| Prop-AMM (Bolt) | 1 pool | 29.7x |
| Peer average | 16 pools, 8 protocols | 1.28x |
Why Zero Slippage Matters
The structural advantage of deterministic pricing independent of capital depth.
How Bolt Works
Technical overview of Bolt’s settlement and hedging architecture.