> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.boltliquidity.io/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # TVL ≠ Liquidity > Why total value locked is a misleading measure of execution quality, and what matters instead. TVL measures the amount of capital locked in a system. It does not measure how well that system executes trades. ## Why TVL Became the Default Metric TVL became the primary metric for evaluating DeFi because, in traditional AMMs, it correlates directly with execution quality. More capital in the pool means tighter spreads and less slippage. But this correlation only holds for models where price depends on pool depth. Bolt breaks this dependency. In a model with oracle-referenced deterministic pricing, execution quality becomes independent of TVL. ## What TVL Actually Measures TVL tells you how much capital is committed. It does not tell you how efficiently that capital is used. A pool with \$100M in TVL that processes \$1M in daily volume has a very different capital efficiency profile than a system that processes the same volume with \$25K. The first requires massive amounts of idle capital sitting in the system. The second deploys capital on demand. When TVL is high but volume is low, you are looking at capital that is not working. That is not success. That is capital commitment that generates no return. ## The Metric That Matters: Throughput-to-Capital Ratio Inventory turnover measures how much volume you can execute per unit of deployed capital. This is the real measure of execution infrastructure quality. **29.7x daily inventory turnover — 23x the Sui DEX peer average.** Across 16 SUI/USDC pools spanning 8 protocols and 4 AMM architectures, the volume-weighted peer turnover is 1.28x. Bolt's turnover rate demonstrates that execution quality can be completely independent of capital depth. This ratio is an architectural proof point. It shows what happens when pricing is deterministic, and capital is deployed on demand rather than locked in idle pools. ## SUI/USDC Turnover by Architecture Turnover = daily volume / deployed capital. Figures are internally benchmarked. | Architecture | Pools tracked | Turnover (vol-weighted) | | --------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------- | | CLMM | 11 pools, 5 protocols | 1.29x | | CLAMM | 1 pool | 2.70x | | CPMM | 1 pool | 0.09x | | Prop-AMM (peer) | 3 pools | 2.04x | | **Bolt** | **1 pool** | **29.7x** | | *Peer average* | *16 pools, 8 protocols* | *1.28x* | ## What This Means for Ecosystems Foundations and ecosystem funds spend millions on liquidity incentive programs to boost TVL, because TVL is how liquidity quality is measured. The assumption is simple: more TVL equals better execution, so pay for TVL. If execution quality is independent of TVL, the metric that drives all this incentive spend becomes irrelevant. Better infrastructure replaces expensive incentives. Capital no longer needs to be bribed into the system. It is attracted by efficiency. This has downstream consequences. If an execution layer can deliver high-quality execution with minimal capital commitment, ecosystems can redirect liquidity incentive budgets toward user acquisition, protocol development, and infrastructure that does not depend on paying for TVL.